Tuesday 24 March 2015

Blurred lines

I read this week that leading educators in Finland are scrapping traditional school subjects in favour of 'Phenomenon' teaching which basically means teaching by topic as in primary schools. It made me think of my dear university friend who could not, would not let her peas touch her mashed potato on a plate of food. Some people like to keep boundaries clear, keep substances and ideas pure, keep each mouthful tasting mono-flavoured. Others like to blend and mix it up, see what happens when substances and ideas mesh.

The experts in Finland would argue that separating out your English from your Maths from your History, etc was very suitable in the early 1900s - it matched the state the world was in and amply prepared students 100 years ago for the nature of employment beyond school. Nowadays, these experts claim, that model is outdated and a poor fit for modern society. Such an interesting thought.

By nature, I am a purist. And I have my own definition for that. It means I like to eat whole nut chocolate when I am alone so no one distracts me from the taste. I like to open letters from my friends only when I have tidied the downstairs and made a cup of tea so nothing will distract me from the pleasure of reading. I've been known to leave a room uncleaned for months because it is due to be repainted and if it's not going to be perfect until it's painted, then why waste energy on it in the meantime? To readers, slightly ocd. To myself, a purist.

However, I am warming to Finland's idea of pulling down the boundaries, forgetting where one thing ends and the next begins. For the next generation, it hails all kinds of precedent for multi-cultural acceptance, for young business owners playing every role in their staff, for pigeon holes of all kinds to be blown apart and rebuilt as open plan pigeon complexes. Classrooms would be full of exploratory projects, with confident independent groups working out the economic viabilities of a ecologically sustainable tree house village for the next Olympic Games.

Then again, if I am a child reading Pride and Prejudice in my traditional English classroom, I want to revel in the language, its rhythms and tricks and beauty. I don't want to be working out the ph levels in the water in Jane Austen's lifetime and working out why those who lived at the top of the hill didn't catch typhoid but the ones at the bottom of the hill did. I know what I'm getting with English and it's pure and it's indulgent and it escapes the need to think logically for a short time. Hmm to blend or not to blend.

Discuss, Finland.

Friday 20 March 2015

The birds.. are the keepers of our secrets

Sitting listening to the birds just moments after the solar eclipse, I realise how they have been my theme for this week. Do you ever have weeks where an object, a word or an idea keeps coming to you, asking to be considered? Well birds have approached me this week. 

Just to be clear, I am no ornithologist. I can just about identify a pigeon, a magpie and an owl. I am intrigued by the idea of birds though - the freedom, the notion of caging, the ability to fly anywhere but staying local. I have just finished a fabulous book called The Gravity of Birds by Tracy Guzeman. It carries themes of loneliness, chosen isolation, redemption, it's pretty intense! But it also tells the story of an artist who had a very poignant experience in his formative years involving a caged bird and a woman he loved. Throughout his entire career as an artist, this bird featured somewhere in every painting. It made me wonder, if I were an artist, what would appear in every painting of mine?

Walking through the woods earlier this week, I was listening to the different calls passing back and forth like an elaborate game that only the birds knew the rules of. I may of course be mistaken but, give one or two pitch variations, each bird seemed to be making the same sound pattern repeatedly. They sounded to my untrained ear as though they were only able to 'say' one thing over and over. Despite what seemed to be an overwhelming limitation, they were incredibly enthusiastic in producing their given phrase over and over. Now, don't take me for a fool, I know there are probably readers out there screaming at me that these calls are a multi-coloured canvas of mating, filial and location signals. But at the end of the day, the sound is pretty much the same. It made me think, if I were a bird, what would my given phrase be? And would I be able to give that phrase renewed excitement every day? 

What on earth would I be happy to paint and say for the rest of my days?


Monday 16 March 2015

So nice to meet you. And so nice to be here. The purpose is simply to write and the writer is so excited you're here.